this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
151 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

8639 readers
2225 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nothing says "classy" like flying that flag.

Good L🍁ck Trudeau! (But also, don't let the door hit you on the way out...)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 98 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

Trudeau will be remembered for many things

including all the conservatives that wanted to fuck him.

Many men were disappointed when arriving at the Ram Ranch to find Trudeau wasn't there.

But they made due.

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

This is in regards to our brethren down south, poking fun at 2nd amendmenters and their manly faΓ§ade. Seems like cons all over the globe mostly like to larp as strong men but like if you gotta hide behind a firearm, are you really manly? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

"Hurt me but make me feel safe at the same time, you pussy liberals" https://youtu.be/TY0eUQ06Q2g

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He is a thirst trap though even after ten years in office. He’s only 53 seems very young to retire. I’m curious to know what he does next. UN ambassador? Ambassador for Canada to France?

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 1 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

Ambassador for Canada to the USA. :-D

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 minutes ago

I don’t think Trudeau is a masochist like that.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Just finding out I'm a raging conservative. Oh god, I need to sit down... On his lap...

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 36 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I loved that the original attack ad they had when he was first running for Prime Minister was that he was too young and handsome to be a leader.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

I'm embarrassed they latched onto his hair. And now, all they can say is 'carbon tax', like we're all rich enough where it's a tax and not a benefit.

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Used to have nice hair, still does, but used to too.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I like it a bit wilder.

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'll also always remember how the Liberals pulled a judo-reverse on the Conservatives by turning their main line of attack back against them. I knew from the moment I saw that ad with Trudeau on the escalator that the Liberals would win.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

Oh, do you have a link? I'm not Canadian but that sounds interesting.

E: Nvm found it.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

found it.

Ah. YOW. Know it well.

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That's the one.

I don't know if my memory of that era comports with actual history, but this is how I remember it playing out:

It looked like the Conservative attack ads were going to win the election for them again, just as they had against Dion and Ignatieff. They were ahead and gaining in the polls, and the Liberals seemed to have no response. The slogan was, "Trudeau: he's just not ready."

Then the polls stabilized for a few days, and the Liberals released that ad. The polls started rapidly reversing, and the Liberals decisively swept into power. I don't think I even saw another, "he's not ready," attack ad from the Conservatives again after that.

EDIT: One can debate how much of an effect that ad had, and whether Trudeau's actions matched it's promises, but for me it will always stick out as a good bit of political strategy.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess that's why the cons dumped o toole he had no hair

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 hours ago

In hindsight he was the best leader they had in a long time

But the Cons are kind of like the scorpion and the frog and I did not trust them one bit.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

And for letting us down on proportional representation: !fairvote@lemmy.ca

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 minute ago

That was defintely the beginning of the end for Trudeau. And lost him all the young voters.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 2 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Proportional representation is not the answer because the party system does not work to begin with.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

But proportional representation does not require political parties to be a part of the electoral system.

See single transferable vote (STV): A Simple Guide to Electoral Systems. It's still a work in progress, but lays out a good framework for discussing electoral systems.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 minutes ago (1 children)

But proportional representation does not require political parties to be a part of the electoral system.

I never said proportional representation requires political parties. I said, and I quote, "Proportional representation is not the answer because the party system does not work to begin with." meaning the system PR is being tacked on to doesn't work and we aren't fixing anything switching from FPTP to PR if we keep the party system.

The party system is the single biggest issue with our Politics. It prevents independents from ever being elected and allows a few parties to control the entire political landscape and narrative.

Which is why the entire history of Canada has been Conservative Government, Liberal Opposition or Liberal Government, Conservative opposition on a federal level excluding that one time because the right old white guy lead the NDP.

The point is we need a complete overhaul, and not a tune up so electoral reform should mean the entire system if we are going to go through with it because it is a huge undertaking.

I also do not need to have you pretentiously offer me "simple guides to political systems" because I think you are wrong.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 48 seconds ago

There isn't a modern democracy in the world that doesn't have political parties. And for good reason, it's wholly impractical. Even single party states such as China have political parties...

The reason we have two major parties is described in Duverger's law. You don't have to think I'm right or wrong, because this is just the reality.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And for letting us down on proportional representation: !fairvote@lemmy.ca

You only think they were going to choose the most complex voting scheme out there.

[–] AlolanVulpix@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Can you explain more? What voting scheme did you have in mind?