this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
151 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

8639 readers
2225 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nothing says "classy" like flying that flag.

Good L๐Ÿck Trudeau! (But also, don't let the door hit you on the way out...)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Thanks for explaining that. It sounds like a better system in that you can force an election at any time. I'm jealous of that right now.

I know the PR and propaganda machines have been going after Canada. I really hope you guys don't get forced or go willingly down the same road as us. I'll be looking for that Poilievre person to not be in the running.

[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

you can force an election at any time.

Thing is, a government with a majority will often easily win a no-confidence kind of challenge. Especially true of conservatives, whose core strength is blind loyalty, there's no point in trying.

[โ€“] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You can force an election for a minority government. If one party has a majority, it can go for a while, more then four years

[โ€“] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, I'm not jealous of the 4 year part unless it has some hidden benefit. Maybe moving that slow keeps it stable?

[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Maybe moving that slow keeps it stable?

That's not how long it takes. We have regional non-conservatives in power here, and they seem to be launching spurious confidence challenges every week. I think their plan is to have so many that people stop showing up and supporting the evil non-cons.

[โ€“] dom@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

It wouldn't be a problem if we had proportional representation. In Canada, a party can get a majority government with a minority of the voting population due to how it's calculated. This often means low voter turnout because a large number of people feel their vote doesn't count.

[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

It wouldnโ€™t be a problem if we had proportional representation

Is there nothing it can't do? (when all you have is a hammer, everything's a nail)

[โ€“] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

So you have the same problem as us. I think in the olden days, our corrupt politicians and elites colluded with the world's corrupt politicians and elites, and had a good laugh how they set it up in their favor.