this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1022 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

10303 readers
648 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1022
An ethics professor at Cambridge talks about teaching ethics in 2025 (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
209 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you legitimately don't recognize the screenshot as being fundamentally based around the issues of subjectivity and objectivity?

I mean.. what are you on about?

[–] dxdydz@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 year ago

I think you should read more carefully in the future, but this time I’ll explain it to you: The OP used the word relative. The reply went into a discussion about how the word subjective has a narrow meaning in philosophy that isn’t the same as the common usage. The OP was not discussing subjectivity in the sense of the reply, nor did it use the word subjective.