this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
85 points (96.7% liked)

Selfhosted

61475 readers
756 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
85
Self-hosted SSO (midwest.social)
submitted 1 year ago by sxan@midwest.social to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

What are you folks using for self-hosted single sign-on?

I have my little LDAP server (lldap is fan-fucking-tastic -- far easier to work with than OpenLDAP, which gave me nothing but heartburn). Some applications can be configured to work with it directly; several don't have LDAP account support. And, ultimately, it'd be nice to have SSO - having the same password everywhere if great, but having to sign in only once (per day or week, or whatever) would be even nicer.

There are several self-hosted Auth* projects; which is the simplest and easiest? I'd really just like a basic start-it-up, point it at my LDAP server, and go. Fine grained ACLs and RBAC support is nice and all, but simplicity is trump in my case. Configuring these systems is, IME, a complex process, with no small numbers of dials to turn.

A half dozen users, and probably only two groups: admin, and everyone else. I don't need fancy. OSS, of course. Is there any of these projects that fit that bill? It would seem to be a common use case for self-hosters, who don't need all the bells and whistles of enterprise-grade solutions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kerberos, you say? Single sign-on?

Have you heard about the LDAP and Kerberos configured as part of setting up samba4ad?

I accidentally enabled SSO SSH a few years back. My samba units aren't on PIs but they could be. They're just on tiny tiny VMs.

[โ€“] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Don't you threaten me with Kerberos. I used to have to deal with that crap decades ago; I disliked it then, and unless it's gotten dramatically easier to work with, it's not an option for me now.

I hadn't heard specifically about samba4ad, but Kerberos on LDAP (and, originally, I think, on OLAP) I'm familiar with.

I like LDAP in concept, but after using OpenLDAP for a few years when my network evolved OpenLDAP evolved out of it. It may have been secure, but a more horribly, difficult to debug piece if software, I've rarely met. LLDAP has changed all that, and allowed me to start using LDAP again; it may be less capable, but OpenLDAP was overkill for home gamers. LLDAP is juuuust right.

Accidentally enabling SSO sounds like a big fish tale. SSO of usually a PITA to configure and set up. Even commercial software offerings are byzantine.