624
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 43 points 2 years ago

I don't know that I agree with that. I guess it depends. For example, if they bought the land and let it return to nature, is that really morally wrong, especially given the remote location? Humans aren't the only ones who might want to use that land.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That would be the best option if nobody else is trying to buy it.

[-] arrow74@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

My dream is to get a large piece of farm land and plant a native food forest. Regenerating the land and creating a sustainable food source.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

That would be cool, but it think the implied context of this post is to use this as an investment to make money. People that are verified on Twitter are generally not good people.

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
624 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

10404 readers
188 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. You can replace the addres of .x.com to xcancel.com in the address. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS