1217
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned Donald Trump and Elon Musk at a packed Arizona rally, accusing them of harming working-class Americans and promoting oligarchy.

Sanders denounced corporate CEOs as “major criminals” exploiting workers, while Ocasio-Cortez called for stronger Democratic leadership.

Rallygoers urged Ocasio-Cortez to challenge Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer after he supported a Republican funding bill.

The rally, part of Sanders' “Stop Oligarchy” tour, follows criticism of the Democratic Party’s weak response to Trump’s agenda and features further events in Colorado and Arizona.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

From here the outside ot really feels that you need to start another party now. Like nice rally and all of that but the dnc has been screwing you over every fuckin time.
Edit: Or a representative parliament system? That winner takes all shit shouldn't be...

[-] rockhard@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

That is because both GOP and DEM are corporatist parties. They will not cater to working class people because those people aren't the ones throwing the most money at them. Left wing populism is nothing more than a tankie wet dream since citizens united.

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

First past the post ensures that any party that tries to splinter off dooms both themselves and the party from which they splintered.

What needs to happen is the democrats need to get tea partied.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 years ago

At this point there's no risk since the Democrats can't win anyway. Might as well deal with a couple split elections while the transition happens because Republicans win even if you don't

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Don't splinter then. Amputate.

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Splinter implies a small breakaway group.

Amputate implies removing a part of the body that is harmful.

Who is really in power in the Democrats and how did they get there?

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Unless you get the same size voting base as Republicans, it still leads to a corpse.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You have just described how voting works.

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

In the US, yes. In other countries (also Alaska and Maine somewhat), the voting system (ranked choice voting, proportional representation, etc) allows for many smaller parties to form. Because no one ends up with 50+% of the vote, these groups have to come together to get things done. With first past the post (which is winner take all, which is heinously stupid), small parties cannot meaningfully form because they cannot possibly get enough votes to get into office.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Or a representative parliament system?

Oh ok we'll get right on that

Edit: it just doesn't really help that these discussions always devolve into comments about "we have to get rid of FPTP" and all that. Yeah, no shit. There's zero chance of that happening in this country at this time. Not without a complete breakdown of the country.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

There’s zero chance of that happening in this country at this time.

Alaska uses Ranked-Choice Voting.

[-] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

Not without a complete breakdown of the country.

Well... You are onto that it seems... So get the hopium?

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Well, OK then.

Shit is going to absolutely fucking suck for everyone then. Not just here. But sure, let's go.

[-] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Personally, I would like a Mixed Member Proportional system, but yeah, anything would be better than what we have now. James Madison is rolling in his grave. He literally wrote in Federalist Paper No. 10 that the republican principal is to reduce factiontionalism, not enable it.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The real solution is to change the party in the primaries.

As flawed as the DNC is, starting a new party will split the non-Republican vote and guarantee the GOP sweeps.

"Change the system!" Yeah - the last Constitutional ammendment that was ratified was in 1992 and had been introduced in the Washington administration.

[-] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Can't you change how the delegate election works at least at a state level?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes. The best thing we can actually hope for at thCompact. regarding national elections is the national popular vote Interstate compact.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

I’ve heard this argument for 30+ years. How long do I wait for it to be true?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

In 2000, if just 1% of the people who voted for Nader in Florida had voted for Gore instead of throwing away their vote on a third-party, we never would have had Bush as President.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

Buddy we don’t even have elections anymore. The voting system is no longer a relevant target.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

But how else will they keep sheepdogging everyone to vote for the billionaires?

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Starting a new party just guarantees Republicans win in landslides.

We need to do to the Democrats, what maga did to Republicans. Primary the old fuckers with young progressive candidates.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
1217 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31278 readers
2986 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS