this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1327 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30930 readers
2343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Atlantic has published unredacted attack plans (non-paywall link) shared in a Signal group chat of senior Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg released the full texts after officials denied sharing war plans or classified information, arguing transparency was necessary amid accusations of dishonesty.

The leaked messages detailed U.S. military strikes targeting Houthis in Yemen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US military got so lucky here.

They're lucky that the incompetence was exposed so early in the administration. Signal isn't allowed on government phones, apparently, so this was all done with personal devices. We've already seen how many people have compromised phones with something like Pegasus installed. This is why secure government phones exist in the first place. Who knows how long some foreign spy agency might have been reading the group chat if they hadn't done such a stupid leak.

They're lucky that the guy accidentally included in the group chat was a responsible journalist, not some rando who'd stay in the group chat and just keep leaking this stuff, or someone who might have chosen to sell access to China or North Korea or something.

They're lucky that the target was Houthi rebels, and not a near-peer nation state. Even with hours of advance warning, the Houthis probably wouldn't have been able to shoot down F-18s. But 3+ hours is plenty of time for a more advanced enemy to set up an ambush.

Can you imagine how it feels to be one of the F-18 pilots reading this article, knowing how close you could have come to getting killed?

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump has always carried a personal phone, which he has always refused to allow intelligence agencies to sweep for spyware. Every bad actor in the world knows what he says the instant he says it.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised of the NSA or a similar agency controls key cell "towers" near the White House and other places he often goes, Mar A Lago, etc. Even in normal times, that's just good practice, but with Trump it might allow them to do some filtering or drop data strategically.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, except now the NSA is being run by a MAGA loyalist, so they probably haven't figured that out yet. Besides, they're all Russian operatives, they're probably making it easier for the Commies to listen in.

The White House has been buggier than a tenement since the last HitlerPig administration.