739
submitted 2 years ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 136 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They also booed her response to the Signal blunder as she said she would not call for resignations, among other things.

https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/rep-spartz-holds-town-hall/657917

[-] Jerb322@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

With a the yelling and her accent, I'm not sure that I comprehended any of her answers. It's quite clear that most in the room didn't like them.

Are they going to say that somehow the liberals crowded the place so there was no one there to back her up?

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Are they going to say that somehow the liberals crowded the place so there was no one there to back her up?

To which I'd say, in that case the ~~conservatives~~ fascists were too unmotivated to counter them.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Some are doing republican only town halls ಠ_ಠ

[-] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Are they going to say that somehow the liberals crowded the place so there was no one there to back her up?

Yeah, that's pretty much exactly what they're doing.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 years ago

I sadly don't have an hour to dedicate to listening to this woman gaslight her own constituents... Sooooo...

Got a time stamp for where she mentions the Signal blunder?

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

That one had tech problems and didnt cover all of it yet.

here is another one at the proper time: https://www.youtube.com/live/IqUhPifi56I?t=6165

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

Thanks so much!

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
739 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31298 readers
1925 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS