this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
806 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The share of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who believe that President Joe Biden’s 2020 election win was not legitimate has ticked back up, according to a new CNN poll fielded throughout July. All told, 69% of Republicans and Republican-leaners say Biden’s win was not legitimate, up from 63% earlier this year and through last fall, even as there is no evidence of election fraud that would have altered the outcome of the contest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was appreciative of the earnest discourse until the southern strategy was ignored and you showed your own bias.

Also, even though it does happen on both sides, gerrymandering by the right is more prolific and undermines the balance of power.

The Senate already has disproportionate representation against the will of the populace because of rural states like the Dakotas, etc. (and, furthermore, it controls judiciary appointments).

Then gerrymandering creates an unearned advantage in the house, and thus the electoral College, which puts all three branches in favor of conservatives.

This is what people mean when they criticize the "both sides" argument. Yes, both side are capable of the same evil, but our system does not reflect that potential equally.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was appreciative of the earnest discourse until the southern strategy was ignored and you showed your own bias.

Ahhh yes, please tell me more about how everything in history democrats have done were actually just republicans, because the parties switched or something.

Also, even though it does happen on both sides

So you lied your last comment?

The Senate already has disproportionate representation against the will of the populace because of rural states like the Dakotas, etc

Was it you that mentioned you aren't american? That makes sense why you would misunderstand it, the purpose of the senate is to have equal representation across ALL states. That was the agreement to create the union between the states. Senate is a fixed 2 seats, congress is based on population. Your misunderstanding of the three branches of government only shows your ignorance, it doesn't show a fault of the system

Then gerrymandering creates an unearned advantage in the house, and thus the electoral College, which puts all three branches in favor of conservatives.

How? It's a level playing field, just because you don't understand senate vs the house doesn't mean it's unfair. You should read up about the system of government.

Yes, both side are capable of the same evil, but our system does not reflect that potential equally.

Meaning that you just dislike one side and you think that they're evil? I'm sorry half the country thinks differently than you, but once again, that's not an inherent flaw of the system, it's actually a sign of a working system. That almost every election, we have close voting in congress and the presidency. It would be concerning if every election republicans got the trinity in the government or liberals did.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't tell if you're intentionally misunderstanding history or just never understood it.

I only made one comment, but it makes sense that you can't follow along with a timeline.

I know the purpose of the Senate. But It's purpose doesn't change the fact that there are representatives there whose constituency consists of more cows than people, by design. And they vote on the judiciary for the whole country including the Supreme Court.

Gerrymandering is a problem because it removes a level playing field. When combined with the other issues we've been discussing, and the modern times we live in, it becomes a much bigger problem.

I'm sorry you're so ignorant about your own government, obviously it's working perfectly for you.

It's less than half the country that "thinks differently", that's the point.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know the purpose of the Senate.

You clearly don't.

But It’s purpose doesn’t change the fact that there are representatives there whose constituency consists of more cows than people, by design.

Yeah, almost like every single state gets....2 senators...ya know, what all the states agreed to when the country was formed.

And they vote on the judiciary for the whole country including the Supreme Court.

Yeah, almost like the agreement the states made to create the country was designed like this. If you want to change the rules, theres constitutional amendments.

Gerrymandering is a problem because it removes a level playing field.

Agreed, you haven't offered a solution.

I’m sorry you’re so ignorant about your own government, obviously it’s working perfectly for you.

It's funny that I explained everything very plainly to you, and you tell me I'm wrong, but can't tell me 1 thing in my comment that was wrong

It’s less than half the country that “thinks differently”, that’s the point.

And our country was designed to protect the minority from tyranny of the majority, that's the point.

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are not a serious person. The minority is running the country.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You are not a serious person. The minority is running the country.

The minority is preventing majority tyranny. States can pass what laws they want, why can't you be fine with california doing what they want in their state, why do you need people in wyoming to abide by what california wants? That's the tyranny of the majority that our founding fathers recognized that you're too ignorant to realize.