this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
328 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2329 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The California governor has been trying to get his Florida Republican counterpart to engage. On Wednesday, he got it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a civil human being I simply believe that conservatives like you do not belong in civil society. It would be beneficial to take modest steps to make the average conservative incapable of purchasing property, being in public without a well informed and civil chaperone, and banned from serving in the armed forces. Such a proposal is in line with rules conservative countries take towards 50% of their population, and thus it is only fair that we adopt mirror policies.

See how fucking little civility matters when fundamental rights are being discussed? Get your head out of your ass and recognize that anger is justified against defenders of fascism like you. You pathetic little weasels probably only supported the 1960s civil rights movement because the white people looked and acted more thuggish than the black activists. Or maybe that still didn't even sway you.

DeSantis actively harassed scientists with police when they tried to report accurate numbers after he withdrew from the national reporting system. Meanwhile, what's the worst policy that Newsom instituted long term? Making people wear masks? I swear, blind fools like you wouldn't recognize authoritarianism if it knocked down your front door. You think economic freedom matters when you live under an oppressive state?

Books should not be banned in a country that supposedly values freedom of speech, period. Mein Kampf, the Turner Diaries, any fucking book should be allowed in libraries if it has the space for it. Hell, if I lived in Florida I'd push to have the Bible banned with your logic. It promotes and is sponsored by organizations that have an actual history of grooming and abuse. That's not even considering the violent and sometimes lewd content in it.

Even that small quote, if that's all there is which is doubtful, misrepresents the nature of why those skills were given. They were given to milk value out of human beings like cattle. It's like saying cows are fed nutritious foods that help them grow. Yes it's technically true, but saying that by itself ignores the reason that food is given. It focuses on a shiny reflection on a picture of a pile of poop.

DeSantis is a fascist supported by Nazis, who hires Nazis. Defending such a piece of shit is pathetic and disgusting. I know you think you're a sensible conservative, but the standard conservative would rather see liberal democracy destroyed than accept that an asshole like Trump could lose an election fair and square. If you choose to side with Republicans at this point, you're a fascist buddy, congrats.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a civil human being I simply believe that conservatives like you do not belong in civil society

It's funny that you're probably the first to call people fascists, but this is an objectively fascist view. People who aren't in your political party don't belong in civil society? Hahaha.

conservative incapable of purchasing property

Fascist.

being in public without a well informed and civil chaperone

Fascist

banned from serving in the armed forces

Because we don't share the same views as you? That's fascist.

Such a proposal is in line with rules conservative countries take towards 50% of their population, and thus it is only fair that we adopt mirror policies.

Which countries are you talking about?

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're clearly incapable of understanding a satirical joke to prove a point. I don't want any one of those fucking things for anyone, yet that's the sort of shit conservatives are pushing for. They're trying to make it illegal to present as any gender other than the one you were assigned at birth in public, effectively banning trans people from public life.

The other points were things that the most extreme in the American right argue for, and policies already enacted against women in conservative theocracies today. Some of these counties are American allies, like Saudi Arabia, and some are enemies like Iran. As much as you might try to deny it, there is serious overlap between Christian nationalists, and ISIS. Those fascist theocracies are the logical conclusion of the modern American right.

The whole point of that paragraph was to highlight how hard it is to be civil with someone threatening your fundamental rights. I wanted to put you in the shoes of the people your evil ideology oppresses. It shows a fundamental lack of respect to even hold and express those extreme views that DeSantis enacts policy on, so of course I have no reason to show you any respect. It doesn't matter how pretty the box is; what matters is what's inside it.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You’re clearly incapable of understanding a satirical joke to prove a point

So you're joking and you think conservatives should be allowed to participate in our society? So your fascist views are in jest?

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Conservatives should be legally allowed to participate in society, yes. Of course what I said was in jest. Just because they are legally protected by the law, doesn't mean other people can't use their own freedom of speech and association to call out and disassociate from awful ideas and people. Protection under the law doesn't mean anyone needs to put up with you.

However, not all restrictions are automatically fascist. In fact, even liberal democracies would be wise to not legally tolerate people who were willing to overthrow the system. Much like tolerance, liberty is a social contract, and those who want to take away the liberty of others should not have their own liberty protected.

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Conservatives should be legally allowed to participate in society, yes.

I'm glad I could help your views progress!

Just because they are legally protected by the law,

Yeah, just as much as...literally every other individual in the country.

doesn’t mean other people can’t use their own freedom of speech and association to call out and disassociate from awful ideas and people.

Agreed, however hating someone because they have different views than you and trying to exclude them because of different beliefs says more about you than them.

However, not all restrictions are automatically fascist. In fact, even liberal democracies would be wise to not legally tolerate people who were willing to overthrow the system.

So you think we should be able to arrest communists, and those wanting to eat the rich?

liberty is a social contract

I disagree, I don't have liberty because other people have a social contract with me, I have liberty because I'm a human being. It's a natural human right. I don't have it because you agree that I have it.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's the issue isn't it? For much of American history, that has been how anti-communists have operated. Unfortunately, liberalism is a fundamentally contradictory system, with economic liberty and personal liberty being two different values. They oppose eachother, and anti-communists ultimately trampled all over people's personal liberty to reinforce capital interests. As long as liberalism exists, there will always be that dialectic. It's why liberalism is unstable and will always try to evolve into a capitalism supporting authoritarian system, or a socialist system. So if one favors liberalism, they ultimately have to choose which parts of liberalism they favor.

The reason we believe we have natural human rights is because it creates the best possible world for us to live in. Sadly, such an idea is a construct, a useful one that should be upheld for mutual benefit, but a construct none the less. The world is not naturally fair and operates based of of might and violence. This is because people are machines, for nothing else could exist in a self consistent logical universe. This doesn't make you less deserving of rights, it just means you need to fight to keep them because they aren't guaranteed.