this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
240 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
376 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] fubo@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The top three causes of preventable fatal injury in the US are:

  1. poisoning (including drug overdoses)
  2. motor vehicles
  3. falls

We might generalize these to:

  1. chemistry
  2. engineering
  3. physics
[โ€“] sci@feddit.nl 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

im pretty sure the engineering is not at fault for most car accidents.

[โ€“] expatriado@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thats true, but we got to agree Nยฐ3 is solely Isaac Newton's fault, for inventing gravity

[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago

I'll never forget the last thing grandpa ever said to me:

"Stop shaking the ladder, you little shit!"

[โ€“] fubo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but neither is the chemist at fault when someone drinks bleach.

[โ€“] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What about the chemical engineers creating fuels that turn out environments into toxic hellholds? Where does all of the pollution in the world come from?

[โ€“] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We could use engineering controls to limit the speed of consumer vehicles to 10 mph, still faster than a human can walk, but slow enough that most deadly accidents could be avoided.

Then establish administrative controls to have public transportation or other professional drivers (taxi operators) have "unlocked" vehicles. They would be required to have routine training and testing to keep their unlocked license.

[โ€“] sci@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

#1 Distracted Driving. ...

#2 Drunk and Drugged Driving. ...

#3 Poor Weather. ...

#4 Reckless Driving and Road Rage. ...

#5 Speeding. ...

limiting speed would not affect the leading 4 causes of car accidents

[โ€“] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

It would affect fatal injury car accidents. A driver would have to be holding a knife pointed at their jugular to be killed in a 10 mph wreck (20 mph total relative speed of get hit another 10 mph limited car).

[โ€“] Contravariant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The third is more gravity than physics, or perhaps you should consider it the absence of gravity.

What I'm trying to say is: stop following geodesics.