Selfhosted

61475 readers

1182 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

140

Alternatives to Roku/AppleTV for Jellyfin Client (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by nix98@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My jellyfin collection has finally become large enough that I have been able to cancel all my streaming services. My issue now is that I want to get rid of my Roku's that are hooked up to each TV.

Is there a good alternative? It MUST be family approved, meaning:

It is not visible (no desktop/laptop hooked up)
It is low power
It has a simple remote control
It supports Jellyfin
It is relatively cheap (< $150)

I am sure I could build something out of a raspberry pi, but:

I don't need another project I have to fiddle with
It MUST support new codecs (h.265/AC1/aac/...) as I want direct play from my server
If it stutters/buffers once, it goes into the trash!

I've generally been mostly happy with my Roku, and my pi.hole blocks most of their analytics, but last week, I pressed the home button on my Roku and it started play a video add with audio. Completely unacceptable (That has happened twice in the last week). And in general, the more of this crap I can get out of my life the better!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] enemenemu@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

            
              If you do not want stuttering, use a graphics card. Higher energy consumption but you can play everything

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If they have a 5th gen or newer Intel CPU, Quicksync will work excellently for transcoding. No discrete GPU needed.

[–] enemenemu@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For how many devices?

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As many as most GPUs without all the extra cost and power draw. Nvidia sets a transcode limit of 2 sessions unless you disable it. You really shouldn't ever be transcoding 4k content. Most people will duplicate 1080p and 4k content and not share the 4k library for remote streaming/external users to avoid transcoding, and 1080p transcodes are no sweat. Furthermore, the goal should be to avoid transcoding wherever possible, so it's unlikely that you'd have multiple people doing intensive transcoding simultaneously if you follow the above advice. You'll want everyone to direct play as much as possible.

[–] enemenemu@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how many 4k streams?

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As many as your hard drives or upload bandwidth can handle since they would be playing directly and not transcoding.

[–] enemenemu@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks, it's good advice that you do not need a gpu if you watch movies in 1080. It's sufficient for 99% setups anyway