653

Van Hollen and Booker showing how representatives in government should be working for their constituents. I hope their aim is to be as annoying as possible until something good comes of it, but I worry Bukele will just arrest them and further erode the numbers we have in Congress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 2 years ago

They need to stop this 1 at a time thing. Get like 40 members of Congress, Senators and Representatives. Show up at CECOT with cameras live streaming and demand to be admitted. When they refuse, force your way in.

I don't believe anyone in El Salvador, including Bukele and the goons staffing the prison, want to have a live stream of them assaulting/arresting a bunch of US members of Congress. And if they do, maybe that'll help wake some Republican voters up to the fascism.

[-] Washedupcynic@lemm.ee 55 points 2 years ago

The Rs would celebrate the Ds getting detained in El Salvadore. Everyone going together would be risky as F. If they all get detained, there are no Ds to push back against this shit.

[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago

Uh.... how exactly are any of them pushing back on anything right now?

[-] valkyrieangela@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago

Excellent argument. We have no constituents to begin with. Time to increase protests.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Protests? We're less than a week from martial law. The time for beliefs of peaceful protest is done.

[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Peaceful demonstrations have ALWAYS played a part in every successful social movement. They shouldn't be the ONLY thing people are doing. They should be paired with more radical strategic actions. But solely relying on violence is also a losing strategy. We should embrace a diversity of tactics, not shout down people who are out there trying to do something.

[-] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I read Donald wants to make those illegal-he wants it like Hungary.

[-] floppybutton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The cynic in me knows that since it would be only D's going down there, the fascists would use their absence to cram some shit through. The smart play would be to send only congresspeople and keep the senators here to make sure that nothing Mike LovesJohnson slides up can pass filibuster and get to the Diet Coke Desk.

[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

That's not really a concern at all. They haven't been using Congress to pass anything thus far. They've just been doing it all through Executive Orders, so it doesn't really matter what Congress can or can't pass.

Plus, that's not how Congress works, either. Republicans hold a majority in both houses. In the House, if all Republicans vote together there's literally nothing Democrats can do (within the normal rules of how Congress functions) to stop them. It doesn't matter if every single Democrat is there or none of them are. They have the same power. And the only difference in the Senate is the existence of the filibuster, but they don't need any Democrats there to use it. They just threaten to filibuster any given piece of legislation and it requires 60 votes to pass (technically, for cloture, then 50+1 to pass, but the effect is 60 to pass). Again, it doesn't matter if all Democrats are present or none are. Their power is exactly the same.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Found the guy in charge of the DNC. After Elsalvador the 40 dems can go to Gaza and sing Kumbaya. Lots of great opportunities for photo ops there. Anything but writing or passing legislation am I right! Fire up those private jets its vacation time before the vacation! and then it's time to get together and pass a 5 trillion dollar tax cut. Then no more legislating for the year, and back to those photo opportunities.

[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

Anything but writing or passing legislation am I right!

How do you propose a party that doesn't control any branches of government pass legislation? And what do you think that would accomplish when the regime has already shown they're willing to ignore the law and courts whenever they want?

You want them to just sit in their offices and do the exact same thing they've been doing for the past decade? That's how we got here.

Yet 1 single Senator taking a trip down to El Salvador was enough to scare the Salvadoran government to let someone out of CECOT for the first time ever, even just temporarily to meet with Van Hollen. And you call this just a photo op? Just 1 guy taking a flight and hosting a press conference was enough to scare them into cracking. And you're saying he should have stayed home to write legislation that'd never even get a vote, let alone get passed into law?

You are a deeply unserious person.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Honestly, I'm done trying to work with Republicans.

[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

Oh, I don't think a single Republican would join in on this, and I wouldn't want those fascists to take part anyways.

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

They are too busy whining that they are scared of the monster they created.

[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Nah. They like what Trump is doing. They are all 100% complicit in it.

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[-] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

Fear is not an excuse for complicity. They all have the option to resign in protest if they're really that principled about it. But they're not. They care more about keeping a position of power.

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, that's kinda my point.

[-] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

What a strange, absurdly bad idea.

load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
653 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31455 readers
2233 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS