this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1395 points (99.2% liked)

World News

32365 readers
416 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A remote worker's worth is no less valuable than one who's onsite. If you want something like this to work then the employer should pay a differential for those who have to be onsite to compensate for the time and money spent commuting.

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So pay the WFF employee more than the WFH employee?

One way is baked in, the other is a topping, still damn near identical though

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Instead of the stick of paying people less from working home, they're getting a carrot for deciding to be there. That has a wildly more positive perception for workers IMO.