502
submitted 2 years ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 2 years ago

Maaaaaaybe the USSR isn't the best example of a better society we want to be building.

I'm watching the whole ideological-purge thing happen in the US and it kinda sucks.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago

Either build something better or shutup, I say. Unless you're a big fan of Tsarist Russia

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I've played civilization and I'm pretty sure there's other forms of government besides Communism and Monarchy that have low corruption, albeit lacking the ability to force the citizens into war on the leader's whim.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Lol, good bit.

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Corruption is a matter of individuals rather than the form of government. Any human system is bound to be corruptible since it involves humans.

I think a strong anti corruption culture is the best defense against it.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

How does one go about building their own government/economic system?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

The Soviet revolution managed it

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, it wasn't one guy on Reddit lol. Why haven't you started the revolution?

And y'all wonder why people rag on .ml.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

The whole point was that I don't reject successful revolutions while not having achieved anything myself. That's you dog.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I never rejected anything, maybe try reading again and this time not just seeing what you want. And what was successful before doesn't mean it will be successful today. People just don't understand context or nuance. That's you dog.

[-] ptee@lemm.ee -5 points 2 years ago

Both extremes on display those examples, seems like they both end up in the same place in the end. Maybe it would be reasonable to use any system that is a mix of things, instead of focusing on pure capitalism or communism.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

There's really no such thing as a pure system, any mix is still going to have either the public sector as principle or private, ie which controls the state, large firms, and key industries. There's no way to keep them "balanced," one will have power over the other, and its best for it to be the public sector.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
502 points (79.0% liked)

Memes

57334 readers
203 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS