653

Van Hollen and Booker showing how representatives in government should be working for their constituents. I hope their aim is to be as annoying as possible until something good comes of it, but I worry Bukele will just arrest them and further erode the numbers we have in Congress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

https://www.reddit.com/r/50501/comments/1k26v6t/john_leguizamo_from_the_mt_article/

Heres a guy with a couple of ideas that seem to be better than photo ops! It would be nice to see a coherent strategy that brought people together. Taking pictures and pretending to resist is not it chief. It's exactly how we got here in the first place. Would love to see a few ideas from this guy come to life. Dragging the ICC into investigate. Starting a civil investigation outside of congress, preparing evidence for prosecution. There are plenty of ideas floating around. I was inspired by Bookers filibuster, i watched for 14 hours. There was no follow up. If you're serious about the fascists and you think that the media is going to suddenly wake people up against them, I have some really disappointing news about media: social, art, and news.

How much oppression do you need before photo ops feel underwhelming? I guess i just have to wait for the hunger to take hold, won't be long now that we've disrupted our agriculture and food imports. big angry hungry mob knows what to do with congressmen who violate their oaths and everyones rights. Democrats are not working to solve this issue. this doesn't go away with Trump. If trump loses Fox news, that doesn't mean fox news is done with this plan. It means their plan got away from them and they need a quiet reset. We can't let this societal rot continue, but it seems we will. As long as the dems can feed you enough false hope through photo ops.

The republicans always lead a good opposition party because they know how to get people pissed, and get the pissed off people involved. We're not doing either lol. Organize more marches, protests boycotts, I want to see more civil rights movement protests, I'd like to see lawmakers organizing those not speeches for the press. Go to republican states, find the republicans who are losing benefits, jobs, houses farms, turn them against republicans. Stop with the TV bullshit, more people watch joe rogan than all of cable news you goobers. its a new world and we let joe rogan hand 15% of trumps voters directly to him. You want a CNN clip. Bro get with le Times.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
653 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31455 readers
2256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS