1061
submitted 1 year ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Viper_NZ 20 points 1 year ago

Credit where credit is due, Bill Gates has been putting his money where his mouth is for decades now.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We don't don't need princes or kings doing PR. If we taxed billionaires out of existence we could fund that and so much more. This guy doesn't get to make up for whatever he was doing on Epstein's plane, at least not without coming clean first.

[-] Viper_NZ 4 points 1 year ago

We could do so much more, but would we? USAID was just shuttered. There's every chance that money would go into the military industrial complex or something equally unpleasant.

Not defending billionaires as a concept (they shouldn't exist, and most aren't as philanthropic as Bill), but I will acknowledge he's doing a lot of good with his money.

[-] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If we had been taxing billionaires for the last 50 years, the education system wouldn't be where it is now and USAID would have never been under threat. In fact USAID would have probably never had to operate within the US.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago

It's also worth mentioning Gates has made our public education system worse by introducing us to the voucher system. Billionaires are part of why we don't spend our tax dollars on things like universal healthcare or free college.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think you can simultaneously be pro-tax and acknowledge Bill Gates is a good person in a sea of villains.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

You can't tax wealth. Wealth is not money.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 year ago

We tax things that aren't money all the time, see property taxes.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago

I have no clue who are "we" in your case, but we don't tax property.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Aux@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

These are not actually property taxes. Stamp duty is like VAT, it's a transaction tax and its rate is very low. You don't pay stamp duty while owning a property. Council tax is a weird abomination and while it is linked to property value in theory, in practice you'll pay the same amount if you live in a £1m house or £50m mansion. Business rates are for business, and property owners don't pay them, only those who rent.

There are no property taxes in the UK. The current government is thinking about land tax, but we'll see if it ever comes to fruition.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It was on the Kamala Harris campaign website that she supported an unrealized gains tax for amounts over $1 Million USD.

Conservatives were freaking out that it might "destroy the economy which relies on foreign investors to prop up the value of USD" lmao.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

Everyone should freak out, because it's an utter lunacy.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Compared to the Republican Shitshow destroying the economy anyways and the infinitely stacking Billionnaire wealth hack it sounds like a dream come true.

The Chinese would figure out a way to get their stock market fix, the USA ended up loaning their gains from the transactions to struggling countries anyways so China divesting in the USA would just cut out the middleman.

[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, TBF that foundation has done a lot of good.

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago

If he had done that, he wouldn't be as wealthy as he is today. Billionaires being billionaires is a big part of the problem, and the only way to remedy that is for them to not be billionaires anymore.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago

All wealth can be turned into money.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

There's a slight issue though - it can't.

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Aux@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Don_alForno@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup.

You're of course free to try and provide an example to the contrary.

[-] Aux@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Example of something that doesn't exist? You remind me of people who believe in god.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1061 points (98.4% liked)

politics

30954 readers
2021 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS