507

The two officials—Paul Perkins, an associate deputy attorney general, and Brian Nieves, a deputy chief of staff and senior policy counsel—were seeking access to the U.S. Copyright Office but were denied entry at around 9 a.m., sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity told The New York Times.

Despite Trump’s appointment of Blanche as acting librarian of Congress, library staff have reportedly been recognizing Robert Newlen as their interim replacement instead, according to The Times’ sources. Newlen was principal deputy librarian and Hayden’s second-in-command.

Staff seem to be waiting for direction from Congress, with Newlen additionally sending an email to employees saying he did not recognize Blanche’s appointment as valid, according to Politico.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

Why couldn't other agencies do this? Almost none of the DOGE crap that's been done has been legal. So why did anybody listen to them at all?

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 64 points 1 year ago

Library of Congress is not part of the executive branch so constitutionally speaking, they don't have new bosses unless Congress says so.

That being said, I could make the argument that DOGE is not a valid department and that all government employees should have resisted yet here we are.

[-] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 36 points 1 year ago

In many of those cases, the building/department security sided with DOGE and physically forced the government employees to comply. There wasn't much they could do to resist without ending up assaulted and detained having accomplished nothing.

My biggest fear over the next few years is how many people who have chosen a career in "enforcement" are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My biggest fear over the next few years is how many people who have chosen a career in "enforcement" are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.

In a lot of enforcement industries it is not really a venn diagram, just two circles with just the tiniessssst bit of offset between them.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The people in that tiny sliver either quit or “accidentally” get shot in the back during a raid.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

how many people who have chosen a career in "enforcement" are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.

If it’s less than 99% …

[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing librarians know how to read more than many other categories of federal workers.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

There was one division that I saw go by that did, and was arrested. I'm guessing that they didn't expect this from librarians.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
507 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31132 readers
4063 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS