860
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 1 year ago

That's because 1/3 of voters tacitly support this shit by not voting.

[-] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

"I'm not into politics. It doesn't impact my life."

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

— Gulag prisoner 4217657

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 22 points 1 year ago

The fptp voting system and gerrymandering did a lot of heavy lifting.

[-] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 9 points 1 year ago

Sorry -- no one can hear how right you are, over the simple glee of blaming the working class for getting so disenfranchised.

Larceny this, mugging that... Can we talk about the greater reach of white collar crime a sec, r?

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

Ah, sadly, no. That story was cut from the broadcast because we found a story about a dog that rides a motorcycle in Sioux City.
“Market research” by our corporate owners says that white collar crime doesn’t bring in the advertising dollars unless the victims are other wealthy people.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I said this a million times last year on the leftist threads to people crying about the lesser evil. I don't wish any pain on their lives but I also don't know how to get through their thick skulls how real life can get unless they experience it from time to time.

[-] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 year ago

I hope they have the day they voted for.

Simple as that. My empathy for those people is gone.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Many people can only learn through personal pain.

So that's what's going to happen.

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago

Because voting is not compulsory in your country so there's no incentive to provide accessibility for people to vote.

Face it, you need a different system. Not going to happen without violence though... It's a very sad state of affairs.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Face it, you need a different system. Not going to happen without violence though…

Unfortunately this is probably where we're at.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's the same number it's been for 100 years. You're never going to change that by pointing it out so what is the goal of this conversation?

[-] Merva@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

That is the kind of aggressive apatheist mentality which got the US into this situation in the first place.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

No, voter suppression and the two party system are what got us in this situation.

We don't have such low voter participation because of vibes. It's structural.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not apathetic, I'm realistic. No one has moved that needle significantly in 100 years so talking about it like you're going to make it happen seems like setting yourself up to fail. Work with what you have instead of wishing you could have more. That's how progress is made.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems -3 points 1 year ago

That's oligarchy apologetics bullshit to keep us from changing the system. No need to make things more democratic if we're blaming the majority of people.

[-] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

That’s oligarchy apologetics bullshit to keep us from changing the system.

Or, you know, I'm being realistic about how things work in the real world. Or do you think that letting the fascists win is going to change the system for the better?

Whether or not you think its 'oligarchy apologetics bullshit', 2/3 of voting the population either explicitly or tacitly supported this shit. So yeah, I'm going to blame the majority for the outcome of a majority vote. Ignoring that fact is just going to make getting any meaningful change that much harder, and its hilarious to watch people justify their inaction in the face of the result of their choice.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 0 points 1 year ago

How exactly does blaming your neighbors create meaningful change? I don't care whether you think it's right or wrong, I am asking how it actually helps improve the system.

[-] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

How exactly does blaming your neighbors create meaningful change?

I don't know, short of trying to show people the errors of their ways in tacitly supporting a fascist. But what other options do we have? Lie to them and say "it's totally not your fault that trump was elected, even though you chose not to put forth the bare minimum effort to stop him"? I get that electoral politics isn't enough (and we all need to be out in the streets doing what we can to resist), but I'm tired of pretending that the third of the country that's checked out of politics isn't also responsible for the people that get elected while they chose to abdicate their responsibility as a member of the voting public.

If this was your neighbors dog is shitting in your yard and not cleaning it up, would you blame the neighbor for their choice (leaving shit in your yard you have to deal with because they couldn't be bothered to pick it up) and try to help them see the error of their ways, or would you ignore the shit entirely and hope they do better next time?

I don't care whether you think it's right or wrong, I am asking how it actually helps improve the system.

Turning your question around, how does ignoring the culpability of nonvoters in election outcomes improve the system? Do you think we'll see an improvement in turnout if we ignore that republicans only win through voter suppression and don't point out that encouraging not voting is one of their preferred strategies?

Increased participation is one of the best ways we can get out of this hole, and I'm really tired of people supposedly in my side constantly getting own goals with this kind of rhetoric.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago

You can address the inaction of voters without making it about blaming individuals with as much power as yourself. But telling people "I told you so" serves a different need.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Sometimes motherfuckers need to be told that they fucked up. I don't care if they're 40 years old or 4. I'm not gonna sit and harp on it but I'm not seeing very many people realizing they fucked up.

On the contrary I heard an NPR piece a few days ago where there were Muslim community organizers in Dearborn MI expressing their regret. I wish more people had some kind of admit you were wrong system.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The people with Trumpgret didn't get there by people telling them they fucked up. These people don't value your opinion so telling them they're wrong is fulfilling your own needs, not anyone else's.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How exactly does blaming your neighbors create meaningful change?

How, exactly, does ignoring a majority of Americans allowing fascism to take hold create meaningful change?

this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
860 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31194 readers
2148 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS