this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
227 points (98.7% liked)

Selfhosted

61361 readers
225 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well there's your problem.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The AI advertising is just a symptom of the underlying issue; VC funding.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The more I learn about AI the more I feel like it’s another dot-com bubble.

LLMs and generative AI are such multifaceted systems that saying “this is for AI” is like saying “this is for the WWW”

Databases, interfaces, storage, networking. All are used in AI but if you just say you make a database and not and “AI database” you’ll lose out on investors.

It’s a bit like the gold rush in that everyone is so fixated on the gold that they don’t see the real economic boom is selling the shovels and building the trains.

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's because it is another bubble. They're all bubbles IMO. Since the boom of the internet they've all been scrambling from one fools gold rush to the next. Crypto, nft, metaverse, AI. Heel even social media that was given freely isn't returning the expected investments and that's why they're all enshitiffying.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

That’s the thing though, free social media was giving them massive returns. But the line must go up. And once they completely saturated the market, there are only two ways to make the line go up: expand the market (give Internet to communities that didn’t have it), or extract more money from your existing users (enshittify). Facebook made a half assed attempt at the first one for a couple years, then pivoted hard to the second.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk -4 points 1 year ago

People have been using AI tech for decades. It's just marketing terms come and go.

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well there's your other problem.

...

...

Next, you're going tell me a billionaire's involved somehow!

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Looks like it's Michael Dell and Masayoshi Son.

Investors include Intel (Pat Gelsinger, net worth ~82m), Dell (Michael Dell, ~112b), and SoftBank (Masayoshi Son, ~29b). Probably others, but I'm on my phone so getting this info is awkward.

[–] tuckerm@feddit.online 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, a few years ago they advertised themselves as the perfect storage solution for blockchain projects.