this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
94 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

61451 readers
353 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi,

As the title suggests: what are alternatives to syncthing that are basically fire and forget, works on multiple device types, and just focuses on file syncing?

I've had over the months the weirdest problems with syncthing, and lately I noticed some of my photos got corrupted, which is an absolute no no for me. I use syncthing currently as a easy automatic backup of documents, photos and other files, between my PCs and my phones (they all send only to the server. Folders are not shared with other devices).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's kind of embarrassing because I used to work as a service technician at a popular computer store in the 2000s and Memtest86+ has been a standard fare of testing. I guess outside of OC, the shorter first pass truly was enough to spot bad RAM in the vast majority of cases. Plus multichannel interactions were not nearly as prevalent in the DDR1/2/3 days. I recently installed 4 DIMMS for 128GB on an AM5 machine just to discover that the 5600 RAM only boots at 3600 in a 4-DIMM config, as per AMD's docs. Could force it higher but without extra adjustment it can't go beyond 4600 on this machine. Back in the day, different DIMMs, often with different chips worked in 2, 4-DIMM configs so long as they matched their JEDEC spec. backinmyday.jpg

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah AMD's memory controllers, especially DDR5 seem to have a lot more difficulty at high speed with 4 slots filled. I used to plan upgrades around populating 2 slots and doubling if needed a few years later, instead now you really need to plan to ignore those slots if you are needing memory performance for things like gaming versus raw capacity.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I didn't need 128GB, but as soon as I figured what's going on with the 4-DIMM config, I ordered another kit to fill what I think I'd need for the lifetime of the system.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similar issues even with just 2 DIMMs with some XMP/EXPO profiles not working on AMD systems because of board/CPU limits. It should technically work, but for whatever reason it just can't handle it and speeds need to be dropped or the timings loosened a bit even though the RMA itself is rated for that.

Not that the higher speeds are even necessary for 90% of users outside extreme overclocking. DDR5 6000 is basically where you reach diminishing returns anyway, and that's often where that limit seems to appear.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Ugh. And as far as I'm reading, we're hitting limits with the connectors and interconnects so the next iteration up might require some type of CAMM interface. 😔