this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
974 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

12031 readers
3535 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm often asking this: how can presidential pardons be defended as acceptable at all, even outside Trump?

This was bound to happen at some point. Presidential pardons were just waiting to be abused.

They're not a thing in many other counties. And thank Christ for that.

Being able to personally just overturn the courts is bar shit insane.

I bet you, there will be political assassinations coming that Trump will simply pardon.

The thing is, if he has no involvement, was this even illegal before the supreme court gave Trump their get-out-of-jail-free card?

Not a laywer, but I could imagine it wouldn't have been.

Trump aside, y'all need to get rid of executive pardons.

Oh, and electronic voting.

Sincerely, from the provinces. Please.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So, ostensibly, pardons are meant to be a way to override the Justice system where it has failed to provide justice. If the law is unjust or it's application was unjust, a pardon can correct that. And ideally it is used sparingly and by a President that that can be trusted to be an arbiter of wisdom and morality. So there's just about no limitations on the power. And the other branches are meant to give consequences for unethical applications of it, like quid pro quo pardons/bribery. But obviously that is not how it works in practice.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the only consequences is that they can be removed from office, that's not really a consequence in my opinion

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Supposedly, if impeached and removed, they can be liable for criminal charges. Idk if that still is the case after the Supreme Court ruling or not.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The theoretical argument is that any justice system no matter how well thought out and well intentioned, will eventually result in edge cases where justice fails to be done. Especially when implemented on a large scale. There are already appeals, and those can fail too. Plenty of examples of people actually being railroaded.

You can just accept that , or you turn to democracy to try alleviate the most egregious cases. Thats what the pardon is for - no process, no more appeals. Just the president, the people's highest representative, and a pen.

It sometimes works (as in, is probably a net benefit) when the person wielding this power fears the people and will pay (at least) a political price for misusing it. Pardoning someone he knows is a complete of the power. Enriching himself by essentially selling pardons throws the whole thing into the world of comedy. Any talk of the theoretical merits of it is laughable.

You can argue that this was inevitable. Maybe you're right. But that was the intent, and it's failure is another symptom of the American democracy degenerating towards failure. Trump won't pay a price for this. Even on conservative forums where they hangwring about "not getting why he's doing this" (as they stare straight at the naked corruption), none of them will change their votes. Nobody is interested in holding him accountable.

This democratic failure has widespread consequences. The open corruption of the pardons process is actually one of the smaller symptoms of it.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I mean even if you're not explicitly selling pardons you don't have to worry about the political consequences of a pardon if it's your last term in office and can't run anymore due to being term limited. So the system is broke from the very start and just allows presidents to override enforcement of laws they don't like at the federal level.