this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
151 points (97.5% liked)

Canada

7226 readers
428 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't care about that argument. They'll say they used science to determine if a company can increase their profits to the detriment of our health and tell us it's good for us.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is Canada, file a freedom of information request, read the peer reviewed articles. Using a science-based process to update the maximum residue limit is exactly what they should be doing. Anti-science conspiracy theories wrapped in cynicism is not helpful.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No I agree it's not helpful. But in this day and age with the type of capitalism what we're living in, forgive me for being cynical.

In Michigan, they tried to convince the people that the water had an acceptable level of lead and that they had nothing to worry about. Even Obama came to support the local government on this. And it turned out it wasn't true. They came up with "scientific" evidence to try to prove it. All of this to support a local business that fucked up the local water supply when changing the aqueducts or some shit.

And I'm sorry but I don't have time to do requests through the freedom of information act and potentially have to fight some bureaucrat because I'm not a journalist.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t have time to do requests through the freedom of information act and potentially have to fight some bureaucrat because I’m not a journalist

Why do you hold such strong opinions about something about which you are not well-informed?

edit: also, we need more citizen journalist to help fill the void as unfortunately local newspapers are disappearing

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We DO need more and better journalists that investigate and find the truth and inform people. Right now it feels like media companies all have some kind of agenda and everything is just clickbait to generate revenue.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Noam Chomsky was right. It's called the Propaganda Model of Communication.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

100% and commercial social media algorithms amplify the clickbait and bury and nuanced perspectives