this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
320 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

61451 readers
367 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The device only was for privacy. When the data was stored in the cloud, the government had unrestricted access. By making it device only they need to get your device to get that data.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol. The only thing this setting does is hide the information from the user. Google, or a thousand other data brokers (many probably created by Google for this purpose) still retain that data indefinitely.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

categorically false. literally do a little bit of research. it is stored on-device entirely now, and Google has no access to it.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Privacy? I'm sure that Google tried so hard to monetize it and after so many years they didn't found a way, couldn't use it for ai training too, so they decided to turn it off and save millions in database costs.

They still exfiltrate user movements for improving Google maps, it's just that they don't need to keep them indefinitely or for years or maintain a nice interface for that

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm sure Google does monetize the gps data instantly, then throws it away rather than save old data that only costs money to respond to government requests.

This is a case where privacy is economically beneficial to Google.

[–] 3abas@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's correct, Google didn't do it out of the goodness of their non-existent heart, they made what they think is the best financial decision.

It's a good one for the consumer though, whether see that or not. It's good that your every move ever taken is stored in a company's database.

Don't worry, they most certainly used it to train a decent model of any typical American demographics movements before scrubbing it.