this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
112 points (74.1% liked)

Programming Humor

3462 readers
2 users here now

Related Communities !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml !programmer_humor@programming.dev !programmerhumor@kbin.social !programming_horror@programming.dev

Other Programming Communities !programming@beehaw.org !programming@programming.dev !programming@lemmy.ml !programming@kbin.social !learn_programming@programming.dev !functional_programming@programming.dev !embedded_prog@lemmy.ml

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rookeh@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No shit. Chess programs are specifically built and optimised to the nth degree for this specific use case and nothing else. They do not share the massive compute overhead and convoluted nondeterministic nature of an LLM.

This is like drag racing an F1 car and a Camry and being surprised at the result.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

This is like drag racing an F1 car and a Camry

More like racing a Reliant Robin and an answering machine.

[–] wer2@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think the Atari Chess program is as optimized as you think.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

1.19 MHz, 1/8 kB RAM

so no transposition tables, no endgame databases, nothing that requires pretty much any memory.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

Or have a real engine designer design a moderately powerful engine vs a computer throws together a blob of metal that looks kinda like an engine