729
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
729 points (98.8% liked)
politics
31194 readers
2754 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I genuinely think I have a crush on her. She consistently smacks these GOP losers around and does it with a smile.
'The girls are fighting'
She is awesome - but I hope they don't intend on running her for president - not because I think she would do any less than a fantastic job, but because we have proven even women in this country won't vote for a woman president. Meanwhile we have children in 5th grade drama running things. "But a woman would be emotional".
Honestly, I'm pretty tired of establishment telling us who we'll vote for.
Not very long ago America was never going to vote for a black man.
Bernie could never beat Trump... for some reason.
I just don't want progressives to do the work of conservatives.
Sounds like DNC logic - "Let's not allow anyone who isn't a right-leaning, but plausibly-moderate, cis-white person to run. We don't want to divide our support. 🤦♂️
Plenty of people voted for Hillary Clinton, despite her being Hillary Clinton. I don't think her being a woman was the issue there.
I think we need to wait and see how things shake out. If she can demonstrate broad based support then why not run her.
If it's only lefties who love her, then she's not the right choice.
I'd love to agree with you but look how it's worked out - the two times the orange idiot has been elected he is running against ladies. It seems an insurmountable hill for the general public to be ok with a woman president
Was it because they were woman or because they were just the same old Democrats people were tired of? You know, the left candidates that are actually right leaning, the establishment. Trying to appeal to the other side while forgetting their own base like a parent giving all of its attention to the one child who constantly does mischief while the others feel left out.
Yeah. There's a correlation vs causation problem here that I don't really have the answers to.
In other words I think that's reductive.
Hillary was Hillary and didn't take Trump seriously.
Kamala was run without much planning and forethought.
AOC might be a woman, and I take your point that may not be in her favor, but she has many virtues that may outweigh that disadvantage.
Women candidates have struggled in the past, but it's looking like Harris at least lost because of voter machine rigging.