202
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 141 points 1 year ago

His presidency will be remembered not for what he did, which was mostly good, but for what he did not do. His legacy will be viewed similarly to Hoover's. Both were principled men who, when faced with a serious problem, could not find it in themselves to deal with it.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dear god, Hoover was a monster and a criminal. He is known in particular for how unprincipled he was. From casually violating human rights at a national scale to targeting civil rights leaders, to blackmail and terrorism, he established the playbook that modern totalitarians like Trump continue to abuse today.

Using Hoover and Biden in the same breath, let alone calling a monster like Hoover “principled” is beyond the pale.

Edit: Ignore this rant. I was thinking J Edgar Hoover, notorious leader of the BOI/FBI, not former president Herbert Hoover who was absolutely a forgettable milquetoast president like Biden. Though Biden didn’t murder and tear-gas our own unemployed veterans, so he does have that going for him.

[-] Forester@pawb.social 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Herbert Hoover sucked ass too, they weren't called Hoovervilles because he did such an amazing job of stewardship and not being a racist.

What's funny is how much accidental overlap there actually is between them. Principled my ass lmao.

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Perhaps principled wasn't the best term I could have used. It was meant in terms of their philosophy of the role of government. There's no question that Herbert Hoover prioritized that over helping people.

[-] Forester@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

That's kind of the point of this thread I'm glad we're having a consensus.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Oh, dear god. You’re right. Ha. That’s actually a very apt comparison.

I complain about J Edgar too much and forgot Herbert Hoover even existed, as I am sure history will forget about Biden.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I was so confused until I got to the edit.

[-] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It still kinda made sense if you knew about the Palmer raids and the first red scare, however, I doubt anybody has ever been taught about those things in the US lol

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah Hoover was pretty bad... We had literal shanty towns all over the place that people called "Hoovervilles"

[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I guess I should have been specific. J Edgar was certainly a monster, he ran the FBI like his own private army and multiple presidents just let him do it.

[-] Krono@lemmy.today 12 points 1 year ago

principled men

Sadly one of Biden's principles was blindly supporting Israel no matter what they do, even through an ongoing genocide.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

....maybe more like Neville Chamberlain's legacy.

[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

"Mostly good"

commits genocide

Yeah, not sure how you put those two together chief

hey those bombs that killed babies in hospitals had shareholders.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

James Buchanan is the analogy I make, and we're likely going to have a similar level of strife following his presidency and the country looking different after the resulting strife

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
202 points (87.4% liked)

politics

31213 readers
2127 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS