this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

61425 readers
554 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Figured I'd ask here as thought self-hosters would care most about looking after their photos.

What do you do with friends' photos you'd like to keep hold of? Maybe there's a pic on a chat app or they've sent you a link to an album on google photos.

Would you just throw into your own pile of photos or do you carefully adjust metadata to indicate who took them? Just use dirs to separate them from your own? Interested in any and all thoughts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your friends should know that you can see their photos if you wanted to though.

Same is true if they save stuff at Google etc. who every owns the server can see their media.

Unless it has E2E encryption

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yes, if you want a decent search function, duplicate detection, etc., then E2E is just not feasible.

Immich developers confirmed they will never implement it, as it breaks too many features of Immich.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Well... E2E is still feasible, that's your VPN for example.

Encryption at rest is where de-dupe, search, etc, can break.