this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
166 points (80.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43940 readers
680 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Given that they also talk about finishing their work with nothing to do, I'm guessing they work one of those jobs that doesn't actually need so many employees but has to have them or are held back by the lowest performers.
The idea of "completing all my tasks" is a silly one to me, since my product has an endless stream of work where we can't do all the things we want to do. If I managed to finish all the things I personally planned to do, that would mean nothing as that's just my personal plan and there's a virtually endless backlog. This has been the case for every job I've had as a software engineer.
Most employers I think pay for time, anyway, not tasks. Even when salaried, it's a salary intended based on time you'd generally work. And if this wasn't the case, many people (myself included) would be penalized for delays.