511
submitted 1 year ago by sundray@lemmus.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Doesn't that just scream government efficiency to you?

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1000 agents who could have been investigating crimes on behalf of victims. Instead, they were tasked with protecting a perpetrator.

e: also, jesus christ, how much work should it take to investigate and flag one ’innocent’ person’s references? 1,000 agents? How many man-hours is that? The man-hours that could have been spent for victims is one unconscionable thing – but how many man-hours should it take to bury this? That’s staggering. I thought we mostly knew what was in these files, but I’d also think 10 agents would be more than enough. What the fuck are we missing?

[-] HenryDorsett@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If they spent just one business day on this, that'd be 8000 man hours, at least as I understand it.

Stretch that out to a single agent working standard work weeks (40 hours) that breaks down to 200 work weeks for a single agent.

That is almost 4 years of work for a single agent, assuming no vacations or other time off (illness, car trouble, etc)

I don't know if that helps you quantify it, but it helped put it in perspective for me.

[-] Heikki2@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Allegedly, there are some 100k pages to go through. As a "deadline" approaches as Wayne from Letterkenny say, "More hands, less work"

This is a waste of time and "efficency" for someone who claims to not know a thing

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the kind of "efficiency" that pleases Taco and his cult. Cancer research? Keep kids from starving to death? Fuck that noise. We need to protect Taco from his own crimes...

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
511 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31414 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS