655
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

committed suicide nearly six years ago

No the fuck he did not

“When you’re working 12 to 15 hours a day to solve real problems and you turn on the TV and see people talking about Jeffrey Epstein, that’s frustrating. That’s where the president’s mindset is,” the senior White House official said.

Lmfao there is absolutely no fucking way orangeboi works for more than 1.2 to 1.5 hours a day.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 40 points 1 year ago

You guys remember when some people were pushing the whole "but it's just a meme" thing?

I do. I remember thinking "his own bodyguard said he had to have help to do that. No fucking way was it suicide."

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Also, define "work". I submit that this guy has never done any real work in his life.

Him doing chopper-talk or talking to his gaggle of tiktok/youtube influencers called a "press pool" in front of the fireplace doesn't really constitute "work". That's just him soaking up the spotlight, which a narcissist like him feeds off of.

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Getting off your ass and to the bathroom so you don't shit your diaper from all the medication you take is one of the most difficult and demanding things you could do in your day... How can you expect anyone to get anything done afterwards?

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 11 points 1 year ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

LOL, good point. I stand corrected. I guess he did indeed do some real work the one time...and now that you mention it, he did that photo-op with the garbage truck, too, where he nearly missed the door.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

No, but he did stand near a fryer long enough to get his photo taken once.

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I think it’s more his staff that’s working 12-15 hour days. Trump himself just golfs.

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Really, just Marco Rubio. He's the only kinda competent person around; he's not that smart, but if he walks into a room in the White House, chances are good he's the smartest one there. That's why they keep giving him new jobs to do.

Except you can't manage people like that. Dude is going to burn out, and then what?

[-] kingofthezyx@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

Lol what? Is this Marco Rubio's publicist? Anyone who still believes Rubio is competent at this point hasn't been paying attention at all.

Let’s dispel with this fiction that Marco Rubio knows what he’s doing. He doesn't know shit about what he’s doing.

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Try reading again. I didn't say he was smart. I said he was the smartest in the room. Which he is. It's not that hard to be the smartest when you're surrounded by idiots.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Yup, it's just an indication of how low the bar is in the Whitehouse that fucking Marco Rubio is the most competent person there right now.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

If reading and shitposting on Twitter counts, I might be able to believe 6 hours tops.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Working hard on getting sports teams back to racist names and making Coke use sugar instead of HFCS.

Such important work.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

He can just put the whole thing to rest by releasing his birth certificate.

Lmfao there is absolutely no fucking way orangeboi works for more than 1.2 to 1.5 hours a day.

you all are saying this but i'd rather have that he works zero hours a day and lets actually competent people make the decisions.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You're assuming there's competent people around him.

[-] thedruid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

He works an hour tops

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
655 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31224 readers
3596 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS