217
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rhvg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That’s what I mean by saying it’s raw and pure, basically capital are free to squeeze workers; but they are not able to change the political order, eg jack ma had to give up control of his company when he tried to criticize those in power.

Not sure why I got these downvotes. People are upset when hearing some evil is good at being evil?

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

So Capitalists in China do what they want as long as they don't interfere with the dictatorship

Not what i would call "good regulation of Capitalism"

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It reads that way esp with all the tankies on here but I don't think that's what they meant. Just that the leadership is good at not letting capitalism take their authoritarian power via money in spite of otherwise letting it run rampant. Which doesn't help the people at all but is remarkable in a way.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
217 points (95.8% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social

1059 readers
1 users here now

COMM HAS MOVED TO !tankiejerk@piefed.social

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS