441
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AreaKode@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

Jail them all. Yes, I say ALL. Did I stutter?

I suppose if being against genocide makes me antisemitic, wanting to release the Epstein files probably makes me a child predator!

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Yup… no loyalty.

Name in Epstein Files? Straight to jail.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. They get a trial, THEN bury the fuckers under the prison.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

The trial is important. Being on a list isn't a crime. Being photographed with or knowing someone isn't a crime. Trafficking and sexual abusing children is. I would assume there are people who knew Epstein and are on the list but were/are not traffickers/abusers. It's up to the justice department to prove who was a criminal. I suspect the files weren't released before because there is insufficient evidence. Now they're not released because certain people are worried they might be on the list.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I would assume there are people who knew Epstein and are on the list but were/are not traffickers/abusers.

Epstein's book with contact info for friends and acquaintances was released years ago. We already have that. That sparked a bunch of stuff when it came out.

All the hubbub now has nothing to do with innocent people, it is specifically about his client list. AKA the guilty ones he helped. Not just the people he knew.

Shroedinger's Epstein List. It simultaneously was on the AG's desk for review a little while back and also never existed.

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Completely agree. Was just trying to be funny. Habeas corpus is a cornerstone of our civilization.

And like, unironically, unsarcastically. Completely seriously. Straight to jail. No bullshit.

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Na… due process is important.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 year ago

Jail? Nah. Line them all up and…

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Anti-pedophilia is antisemitism

/s, but also Rabbi Kaye subbed at my congregation shortly before appearing on To Catch a Predator, so it's a soft "/s," but only anecdotally.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Anti-pedophilia is antisemitism

This kind of reminds me of how every several years it seems like a group of pedo's tries to portray themselves as an oppressed minority, and try to "join" LGBT+ spaces. Hard to say how much was genuine vs anti-lgbt astroturfing. I wonder if they will pop up again in all this.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I feel like I remember a college dorm mate telling me about NAMBLA and Butterfly Kisses? The fact that people were so nonchalant to have public meetings like that was horrifying. And he was so matter-of-fact about all of it. I should have caught on sooner just how fucked up he was...

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I know about NAMBLA from South Park, (National American Marlin Brando Lookalike Association) but do I want to know what Butterfly Kisses is?

On one hand I feel like I should, on the other, ignorance may be blissful and I have no desire to search it.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

i think it's a song about parenthood by Bob Carlisle

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

That makes my curiosity worse, but I'm anticipating it being more horrifying.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

They've done all sorts of stuff. Like there was the whole ebinopholoa or whatever where they argued, until you just couldn't stomach it anymore, that post-pubescent children are ok

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
441 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31232 readers
2622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS