this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
910 points (98.1% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27545 readers
196 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is how you started the conversation but all of a sudden I’m being condescending.

Ye, it was a made up scenario completely irrelevant to the pic.

But they only get to be unfair the in the ways that you decide right?

Nope. Just by random chance in genes or by agreed upon rules. And a vast majority seems to agree that born men shouldn't be allowed in the womens division. Seems pretty cut and dry.

We’ve always done it this way! What a great reason to keep doing something and never reflect and change for the better!

There is nothing to reflect on. Other than maybe having a trans-only category. If anyone would care to have one. Trans are already allowed to compete in the open category, aka mens.

Or you could remove womens sport all together, as that seems to be what you're implying. Something i would be vehemetely against

[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool, I'm done with the cherry picking here. Have fun with your completely "fair" sports untainted by the presence of those game breaking trans athletes.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks. Keep your politics out of the sports that you don't even like.

[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guarantee you I support and care more about women's sports than you do but keep teeing off on these straw men, it makes you look really strong.

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guarantee that you don't. I know that from how you talk about sports. The fact that you try to shoehorn the only logical fallacy that you know the name of is telling of your intention to just antagonize without any analysis or thought.

[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

They made the comment that she wasnt born tall, like an idiot. Implying that she wouldn't have been tall naturally.

Here's you being too stupid to understand an obvious joke. That's an example of antagonizing without analysis or thought.