201
submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@piefed.world to c/firefox@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vatlark@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can buy a book and cross out words with a sharpie if I want. I can't go make copies of my edited book and distribute them, but I can do what I want with my copy that I legally acquired.

An ad blocker just edits the local copy. It's not re-publishing the site without ads.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

You tell that to the lawmakers. Because right now the only ones talking to them are the industry lobbyists

[-] iii@mander.xyz 32 points 1 year ago

You made one mistake: expecting laws to make logical sense, especially when it comes to technology

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder if someone set up a Language Model that just regurgitated the information in its own words without the ads (like LLMs do) how sites would be able to complain about it.

[-] vatlark@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah LLMs are actually a tricky copy-right problem and they seem to be getting a free pass.

Ad blockers don't seem to be tricky.

[-] iii@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they seem to be getting a free pass

Because the legal system is a war of attrition in who can pay the lawyers the longest. The traditional media knows they'll lose that ware against the tech magnates. They also know they'll win against the browser addon developer.

It's because the billionaires are the ones controlling the businesses of generative AI.

Adblockers are benefitting the middle class and the poors at the expense of billionaires, so they can't stay.

It's literally that simple, unfortunately.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
201 points (99.5% liked)

Firefox

7520 readers
2 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS