127
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
127 points (95.7% liked)
Fuck Cars
16828 readers
707 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Weak personal attack.
Use your brain. You are advocating to make roads into obstacle courses in order to slow everyone down. By definition you are making that road a skill issue for half the population, assuming you build the road to the "average" drivers ability at the speed needed. Which also means half the population is gonna be capable of going faster than that, which it seems you would then believe they are just gonna speed anyways?
Why do that? What if instead there was a simple, effective, low cost way to communicate a "limit"? That way we could just put a sign up. And if things change, or we start seeing somewhere were that "limit" we have set is to slow or fast, we can just change the sign instead of redesigning the neighbourhood. We of course would have to create a system of enforcement....
We've seen what enforcement looks like, its villages with 100 feet of 30 mph road in the middle of an 80 mph highway that finances their entire police department, shortened yellow lights to catch drivers with red-light cameras, and red light cameras not caring about dead-red laws for motorbikes.
Laws that enforce themselves are not subject to such exploitation.
But also curvier roads are just more aestically pleasing and pleasant to drive/ride on.
Citations needed. And don't start talking about red light cameras, I am discussing speed cameras. I don't like red light cameras for all your reasons listed.
I too love winding highway roads. They never seem to be where these cameras are.
Try driving in Florida or western New York sometime.
Here's one town that got slapped for going too far: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/02/florida-speed-trap-town-disbands-police-force