Linus Tech Tips

3791 readers

2 users here now

~~⚠️ De-clickbait-ify the youtube titles or your post will be removed!~~

~~Floatplane titles are perfectly fine.~~

~~LTT/LMG community. Brought to you by ******... Actually, no, not this time. This time it's brought to you by Lemmy, the open communities and free and open source software!~~

~~If you post videos from Youtube/LTT, please please un-clickbait the titles. (You can use the title from https://nitter.net/LTTtranslator/ but it doesn't seem to have been updated in quite some while...)~~

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

7heo@lemmy.ml

928

The Problem with Linus Tech Tips: Accuracy, Ethics, & Responsibility (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml to c/linustechtips@lemmy.ml

303 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sverit@feddit.de 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here is his response: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1526180-gamers-nexus-alleges-lmg-has-insufficient-ethics-and-integrity/page/16/?__cf_chl_rt_tk=riEm65zw7EleA5UJEi3eN8ZaHnVo6Smg27vxUlGW5uk-1692115262-0-gaNycGzNDGU#comment-16078641

My take on it:

We know that we’re not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it’s sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing.

Yeah, well, that’s one of the main issues addressed in this video: You are not transparent about this, when you swap out videos without notice or bury corrections in a non-pinned comment.

Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn’t materially change the recommendation.

If the listing is wrong, who guarantees the lab tests on which the conclusion is based on are not wrong?

The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes.

Take the time it needs to produce correct reviews then. Who wants fast but false results?

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The part that struck me was Linus talking about how he hopes Billet does well because it's a harsh industry. It's a harsh industry for Billet because the biggest reviewer in the space took their prototype, mis-tested it, panned it, and then sold it at auction. Trying to paint that as a one-off is difficult, because it wasn't a mixed bag on the quality of the experience. It was awful start to finish.

If I'm a small company trying to get a name in the space, I'd never go to LMG. "Trust me bro, we dunk on stuff, so you know we're honest," is a bad take if you're the one getting dunked on due to lazy journalism and R&D.

[–] sverit@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that was super unprofessional :/

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some of the most frustrating and least empathetic people are the ones who come from nothing. They grind down people who are currently drowning at the bottom like they're doing them a favor.

[–] sverit@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Followup on Linus' response from GN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3byz3txpso

[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we have a discussion on it going on here https://lemmy.ml/post/3376890?scrollToComments=true

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah I pinned that.