111
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SinTan1729@programming.dev to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

This release adds the ability to edit existing links, show and download QR codes for easy sharing, and various improvements in the frontend. Check out the release note for a list of all changes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

I am digging this, thanks for keeping it updated and improving it!

I see that you say it's feature complete / no user stuff; but it'd really mesh well if it took OIDC authentication. Don't need it to make users or anything, just instead of the password popup the OIDC provider is asked for confirmation that whatever user registered with the OIDC is logged in. That'd let me leverage extra 2FA protection from the OIDC provider and juice on that one-login life.

Now I have no experience making OIDC crap work nor how it even works behind the scenes, so I can't help :( sorry; just wishful thinking.

Also saw on your github - hope our newly shit-out gestapo don't bother you!

[-] SinTan1729@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't understand much about OIDC either. But I'll keep it in mind. Thanks.

[-] flubba86@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This would require configuration with a whitelist of which OIDC IdPs to trust. Otherwise anybody could self-authorise a OIDC token (using their own IdP) and use that to log in.

[-] SinTan1729@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmm, so that might be out of scope here. But I can try to do some kind of 2FA, shouldn't be much of an issue, really. It's just that I never thought a link shortener needed 2FA protection since the links will be publicly shared anyway.

[-] flubba86@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I agree with you, a simple minimal url-shortener does not need 2FA.

Yes that tracks with how OIDC setup works with my other services (you give the container the OIDC links and shared secrets so it knows how to talk to the OIDC and trust it).

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
111 points (93.7% liked)

Selfhosted

62392 readers
302 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS