118
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/houston@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] protist@mander.xyz 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Instead of calling it "ding dong ditch" we could call it "shooting a child in the back while they're running away from you."

I'm struggling to conceive why you're implying shooting a kid in the back while they're running away from you can be justified in some way. Whatever threat may or may not have existed was clearly over when the children started running away.

[-] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

That certainly would be a more accurate description of the known facts

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

He's not trying to justify the shooting, only saying it may not have played out as we're imagining.

[-] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

He is getting charged with a crime, so the law agrees with you here.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
118 points (99.2% liked)

Houston

483 readers
8 users here now

For news, events, and everything else going on in the Houston area, Texas-wide stories should be in Texas

Sports

Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow

BYPASSING PAYWALLS

Rules (Subject to Change)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS