The reality though is that that behavior is antithetical to organize
That's the point. It's meant to be conversation stopping. If he were poor, it's: he was envious of those who were successful.
If he's rich: somehow they try to make it hypocritical
Because they don't want the actual topic being discussed. That's the point of the ad hominem, they attack the messenger so they don't have to engage with the topic.
If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)
That's the point. It's meant to be conversation stopping. If he were poor, it's: he was envious of those who were successful.
If he's rich: somehow they try to make it hypocritical
Because they don't want the actual topic being discussed. That's the point of the ad hominem, they attack the messenger so they don't have to engage with the topic.