90
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 4 points 11 months ago

Unless you're talking about moving completely to the darknet.

I really wish i2p would take off and people would seriously consider hosting stuff there.

Like why is Lemmy and most federated social media not on the dark web? It would make so much more sense and be much more resilient to censorship.

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Because with Lemmy's architecture darknet sites could not federate with clearnet sites as the end user's browser fetches content directly from the federated instances.

[-] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because with Lemmy’s architecture darknet sites could not federate with clearnet sites as the end user’s browser fetches content directly from the federated instances.

Ehhh, that just seems like something someone hasn't fixed yet but easily could if built for that purpose. No one's taken a hammer to that nail yet.

A tunnel could exist on each server that relays to TOR and back to the instance, allowing it to federate with .onion instances under an alias or something. TOR is extremely flexible with tunneling and being really specific with what you let in and from where. I could see how it could be tailored to the purpose.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 11 months ago

Right, but why not build it from the ground up to support the dark web?

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

I never said you couldn't, just that it doesn't work that way now

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

5093 readers
43 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS