22
'addr:city is redundant' (poptalk.scrubbles.tech)

I just ran across a changeset that removed addr:city from a bunch of POIs, on the grounds that it was "redundant with boundary data." Some of these POIs had a Canadian postcode that would indeed imply city, but others had no postcode. The city could of course be calculated by the POI's presence inside the city relation, but I hadn't seen this as a rationale to remove information before.

Would people consider this valid? By extension, should I stop documenting the city when I create a POI; is it considered noise?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Keeping it as a source of ground truth would be nice from a development standpoint. Automated testing could then check whether over 5% (or whatever the average error is) of the automatically generated city data differs from the user submitted ones and warn you that you fucked up the auto generation.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

OpenStreetMap community

5654 readers
1 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS