this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
245 points (99.6% liked)

Selfhosted

61425 readers
848 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

In general, for self-hosting, we hardly rely on remote service/server. The whole idea of self-hosting is to shun dependency on external service/server, and run everything on your own hardware and network. So that every aspect of the service is in your control. I don't think self-hosting comes with much risk, unless you make your service available on Internet.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 11 months ago

Not really true for self hosting a media library though, as this all relies on indexers, torrent sites, Usenet providers, metadata providers, subtitle providers, etc. If you host it for others outside of your household, you also rely on your ISP, their ISP, etc.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jellyfish cannot to setup to securely and safely be exposed to the Internet. It is only safe to access through a VPN. That rules it out as an option for sharing with friends, family, or even my own spouse. You call it phoning home to the mother ship; I call it paying Plex to manage user authentication for me. Until Jellyfin's security holes are patched and it becomes clear that the Jellyfin developers actually care about security, it stays locked down to my LAN. Setting up a VPN is difficult for the average user on a good day, impossible in some circumstances on even the best of days, and is not access I want to hand out (and support) to all the people I share my Plex with anyway.

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

https://tailscale.com/ This is essentially a mesh Wireguard Tunnel connectivity that ensures only you can access your service remotely.

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

That's not very helpful for connecting family, friends, and especially grandma.