232
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Please mark NSFW/NSFL - I get that the destination is marked, ours needs to be as well.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

Surrounded it in spoiler with appropriate title. Is there another way to mark it NSFW in a comment?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Just put a big "NSFW/NSFL" on it.

Pro tip... If you start a line with a # and a space:

it makes things HUGE!

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Well, there was ample warnings on that link… but I still wasn’t prepared.

[-] RealSpiderLane@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 months ago

Unless there are some miracle worker surgeons nearby, yeah…whew buddy.

I work in security, have dealt with people ODing, people with gnarly injuries; that’s definitely a gnarly injury.

[-] Addition@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

Oh shit he's dead dead. There ain't no way he's surviving that.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

JFC - please be sure you really want to see it before you click.

I’m in shock

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Fucken hell that got even me a bit and I was desensitized by LiveLeak years ago.

[-] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Was just about to comment the same. I’ve seen bad shit thanks to my adhd and the all too common morbid curiosity.

Even I wasn’t ready for that, it’s not common to get such a close and focused view on that shit…

I want to emphasis, for anyone morbidly curious, you really ought not click the link unless you want to feel very upset and uneasy. Be warned.

Also, as a side note, that’s not an easy single shot to make, especially if the initial reports are right that it was taken 200 meters away… unless you’re a professional. You have to be very familiar with the gun and really have the sights/scope honed to leave it at a singular shot like that. That’s a small target at that distance even if aiming for center of mass. It’s from the side as well it seems… not many would be comfortable taking that one.

I don’t like this somehow. Feels wrong, even if here especially the target really had it coming.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Id like to note that it made be a bit iffy but between the autism and C-PTSD it barely got me. But yeah if that's my reaction you should be cautious.

Also I doubt the shooter was aiming for the neck, Kirk was moving and it's between both the rough outer range for both a body shot and a headshot. It's possible they were going for center mass but due to various factors nailed him in the neck.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Been following the talking heads on the news and the consensus among professionals is that it's not a particularly hard shot and, if anything, shooter was aiming for a headshot and wasn't prepared for the bullet drop and got lucky.

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

What’s near the neck? The head? The chest? Trachea?

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 11 months ago

They would have said in the brain, but that requires brain to be there

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

It looked to be in his left side of the neck to me. Very severe shot. This is not a Trump "well, maybe he faked it with razor blades" kind of thing. Dude was straight up shot in the neck.

[-] b34k@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, I watched that video…. Quite horrifying

But weird they say “near the neck” rather than “in the neck” in the article

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Journalists are going to error on the indefinite side if they don't personally know. Anyone who watched the video would say "He got shot in the neck." But if you're only hearing about it 2nd hand you say what you do know.

Source: Wife has a journalism degree.

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Lower left side of the neck, just above the clavicle.

[-] 0ops@piefed.zip 5 points 11 months ago

If you take the limit of "near" then yes

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
232 points (96.4% liked)

politics

30994 readers
1778 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS