You can dislike much of what Kirk believed and the following statement is still true: Kirk was practicing politics in exactly the right way. He was showing up to campuses and talking with anyone who would talk to him. He was one of the era’s most effective practitioners of persuasion. When the left thought its hold on the hearts and minds of college students was nearly absolute, Kirk showed up again and again to break it. Slowly, then all at once, he did. College-age voters shifted sharply right in the 2024 election.

That was not all Kirk’s doing, but he was central in laying the groundwork for it. I did not know Kirk, and I am not the right person to eulogize him. But I envied what he built. A taste for disagreement is a virtue in a democracy. Liberalism could use more of his moxie and fearlessness. In the inaugural episode of his podcast, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California hosted Kirk, admitting that his son was a huge fan. What a testament to Kirk’s project.

Op-Ed in America's leading newspaper by one of its most highly publicized liberal pundits

This is well past Orwellian. We're fully through the looking glass, folks.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

That's fucking creepy.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

This shit is exactly why I finally unsubscribed to NYT this year. That and the constant "there is no genocide in Gaza" horseshit.