this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
1344 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

63010 readers
4549 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thanks to Popcrave https://twitter.com/popcrave/status/1691852136236327316?s=46&t=lcH0dp9biwkMEBKsRQeVeQ

Who here is going to put their ID and photo on X/Twitter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] steve228uk@lemmy.world 646 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Nobody, absolutely nobody should trust that idiot with your ID.

[–] pizza-bagel@kbin.social 276 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If you always wanted to leak your ID to a bunch of hackers thanks to poor security practices, this is a great opportunity for you to do so

[–] netburnr@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Nothing the credit agencies don't already leak every year or two...

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

or everyone could recognize that he is far more malevolent toward you than any hacker could possibly be, but yeah, they definitely have no security that worries about YOUR data

[–] mister_monster@monero.town 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's not about trusting some idiot. It's about attaching your identity to your activities online. I remember when these websites used to advise against doxing yourself.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Then swatting opponents will be much easier

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I mean this whole process is explicitly for the purpose of attaching your identity to your online activities. If you don't want to do it, just don't.

I shudder to think of what will happen when hackers inevitably get into Twitter servers and steal all those IDs though...

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It’s not technically hacking when Elon leaves the door open after slamming his dick in it.

[–] KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It has already happened before. It will happen again.

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah. I'd rather hand it over to the weird guy at the bus stop. At least he's not a billionaire douche bag.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It feels like even random software crackers are safer than Elon

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 22 points 2 years ago

Meth addicted inbred sociopathic hamster human hybrids are safer than Elon.

[–] easeKItMAn@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Guessing, millions of people will feel obligated to share their ID. Not everyone can be saved

[–] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Ironically, it's going to be a bunch of "libertarian" tech bros who use crypto for "privacy" who will be the first to give Musk (and by proxy every world government) their ID.

[–] xmr_unlimited@monero.town 2 points 2 years ago

Probably most monero users dont use kyc exchanges so i dont think they will use kyc twitter let alone the first ones. This may kill twitter, but there is lots of stupid out there like those crypto and bitcoin users lol so you never know.

[–] Strangle@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shouldn’t trust Twitter users either, they’ll take an out of context joke you made back in 2011 and ruin your life over it.

Honestly, just fuck talking to people online. Literal no good will ever come of it. I’m just gonna stop communicating with people.

This shit is so dumb, no upside, only downsides

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ackshually, it's upvotes and downvotes ☝️🤓

[–] artisanrox@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago
[–] fisco@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Many will just go along with this bollocks....🤦🏻‍♂️

[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Very interested to see how the “small government” crowd deals with this.

[–] Falmarri@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Didn't voat or truth social or something require IDs and the idiots all flocked to it?

[–] elscallr@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that was Parler for the whole 3 mooches it was a thing.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Glad mooch remains a unit of measurement.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Dunno about the others, but I specifically remember Parler required users to attach their IDs to their profiles if they wanted to be verified.

[–] fisco@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago
[–] elscallr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

As one of the "small government" crowd I'm not trusting that douchebag with my information.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's gonna dox all the liberals/lefties. Wouldn't be surprised if this wasn't the original plan.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

And journalists if they report on him negatively, or oppose his Russian “peace” talk suggestions, even if it puts their career in danger where they live. Peak freedom of speech absolutism!

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Instructions unclear. Uploaded my social security card and DNA samples.

[–] SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would trust pornhub with my ID more than I'd trust that asshat with it.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They'd at least understand the need for privacy