1035
OAuth
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
1035 points (99.1% liked)
Programmer Humor
33472 readers
2202 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
- If the mod doesn't find it funny, you're banned. Ha-ha!... For real: do not use the community for "statements". There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
We're going to return to user + password in the near future.
Please drink verification can to continue
The code is at the bottom of the can and can only be seen be shining a flashlight down it. This completes Step 1 of the verification.
Oh and it changes your pee color so it can reveal the ~~passkey~~ pisskey verification QR code on the urinal in front of you to complete Step 2 of the verification.
It costs the company millions a year but at least no poor person gets anything for free.
Passkeys, more likely.
Half a cryptographic key that you can't easily give to someone over the phone by accident.
By convention. See for example: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/10407
We’ve had certificate authentication (backed by hardware) for ages. We could fix the UX there and be done with it, but nooooo, we are reinventing everything again. (Tangentially related: JWT, OIDC and SAML are basically kerberos with extra steps.)
I've been using certificate based auth on https for ages on my ops stuff. Most devices support just slapping an SSL/TLS key into their os, but not everything.
But when I wanted to use it for Jellyfin, I found TVs and sticks aren't all straightforward.
In your link, they closed that ticket as not planned because they intend to implement FIDO's secure exchange protocols. https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/11363
It should (hopefully) be secure when they get done.
I mean, the passkey is still in there. It’s protected by convention. It’s a bearer token wrapped in a password manager, presented as a revolution.
We have the technology, can we please pour the same amount of resources into what we’ve already had for decades? Passkeys solve the UX issue for ”normal people”, that’s the selling point.
a very long password that (ideally) is only bound to a single device, requires a second identifier (biometric, PIN, password) and that is phishing resistant.
Bitwarden has been working great with me as sits transition to passkeys, even big corporate ones.
But yeah in practice, google and facebook are going to probably dominate because they are the easy + free option.
KeepassXC supports passkeys as well.
thus rendering them redundant, because their strength is being bound to a single physical device. if they're portable, they're as good as asymmetric key pairs.
Their strength is being half a cryptographic key, not that they’re device bound.
That was a “requirement” that big tech wanted, to force you to be dependent on TPM storage, so you’d be forced to use a Trusted(tm) device and OS. It was made optional after pushback from basically everyone else.
Password managers support Passkeys now. Bitwarden and KeePassX among others.
As long as I trust that my password manager is secure, and as long as I use a strong master password or (better) have a hardware key to unlock it, it is way more secure than a password, and I can still install Linux without losing my logins.
that's not the point, passkeys are not vendor centric, they are a standard. you don't want to duplicate a passkey for the same reason you don't want to copy an SSH private key on multiple devices. it's a security feature that allows disabling the account access in case the device becomes compromised (lost, stolen, infected, etc.)
xmpp is still alive and is still an open standard
Bitwarden let's you sync your passkeys between devices. And you can also unlock your vault with one stored on a physical security key.
i refuse to give my phone my thumbprint or do a face unlock. i'm not sure if it's still collecting a biometric bullshit on my face, but i have not done it myself. I'm a luddite here and i insist on it so no one (especially no one trying to violate the united states 4th amendment) can get into my phone without my permission or hacking into it.
Then get a Yubikey. Replace “something you are” with “something you have”. It’s not ideal to have two somethings you have as your two factors, but a password to get into the computer to get to the passkey adds an extra layer that makes me comfortable with it.
In the context of this discussion, it’s one of two factors. But I agree with you when it’s the only factor.
Ooh-la-la, someone's gonna get laid in college.
Edit: This is a joking reference from a Rick and Morty episode (S02E06).
Oh, I’m sorry. It’s a reference to a Rick and Morty episode. I thought that’s what you were referring to.
You forgot, you descended into the lemmy-verse powering your car where the concept of Rick and Morty humor is not appreciated and often not tolerated.
;)
WUBBU-LUBBA-DUB-DUB!!!!!!!!
i never stopped
Log in with the honor system.