480
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Missing something here. How are the feds prosecuting for murder when murder has always been a state charge? In any case, is this not double jeopardy?

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago

I think because he fled across state lines. It seems like a stretch to me, but I am not a lawyer.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 1 year ago
[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not that much of a stretch. Since a state may refuse to arrest someone who committed a crime in a different state if they are sympathetic to said crime (especially a concern when USA was split between slavery and anti-slavery states), the feds can have jurisdiction in these cases, since otherwise it may involve a dispute between states. It makes at least some sense...

If you want to see a real stretch (aka completely made up bullshit), look up how feds justify growing marihuana for your own consumption (not sale) somehow involves interstate commerce.

[-] homura1650@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Double jeopardy does not apply to facing federal and state charges under the dual sovereign doctrine. It does not really make sense, but that's the law.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
480 points (99.0% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2873 readers
2 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

Please respect Lemmy.world ToS. Don't plot who should be murdered next in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS