321

The United Nations believes it has solved the mystery of why an escalator abruptly stopped shortly after Donald Trump stepped onto it on Tuesday - his videographer may have accidentally triggered a safety mechanism.

U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said a readout of the escalator's central processing unit indicated it "had stopped after a built-in safety mechanism on the comb step was triggered at the top of the escalator."

He said Trump's videographer had been traveling backwards up the escalator to capture his arrival with First Lady Melania Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

OMG.....it became....stairs. Walk up them you slob.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago
[-] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago
[-] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago
[-] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

All I can say is that if a specific other Mitch had died in 2005 instead of Mitch Hedberg, the scotus might've prevented the US from doing a fascism. But alas, we're in this timeline.

[-] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I still have no idea who you are referring to unless it’s McConnell

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I mean, first of all you have to remember he's afraid of stairs. Probably less so on an escalator because it has big sides but still.

Melania deserves a lot of shit but she just said fuck it I'm walking and kept moving which was the right thing as it happened. Demented Donny Rapist would have just stood there for another half hour.

[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Trump's description of this is so hilarious

"All I got from the United nations was an escalator that stopped right in the middle. If the first lady wasn't in great shape, she would've fallen. But she's in great shape. We're both in good shape."

Like I get it I guess but it just became stairs. Are we seriously acting like conquering a flight of stairs is some heroic feat that requires Herculean strength and athleticism?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

He looked dumb, so of course its the evil Democrats out to get him. United Nations, whatever. They didn’t hire him to remodel their building.

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

It is in a gerontocracy.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

As Mitch once said, they can never break!

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Technically, you shouldn't walk on stopped escalators. There's the obvious (though less bothersome) issue of the uneven and higher-than-normal rise...but also that escalators aren't designed for a static load, and other components can suddenly fail, leading to a partial collapse.

There's also the issue that the escalator could suddenly start moving again, which, if you're using them as stairs, could really throw you off (in more ways than one).

Not trying to side with Trump here...not at all...just pointing out the lesser-known safety concerns of stopped escalators. They aren't "temporarily stairs", like Mitch said...especially in high traffic areas, where people of mixed physical capabilities may be using them.

[-] hexappeal16@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think the whole world knows by now we couldn't get that lucky 🤣

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
321 points (98.8% liked)

politics

31522 readers
2263 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS