this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
1442 points (94.2% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1816 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] explodicle@local106.com 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't think hours of noise canceling headphones are a realistic solution for everyone, like people with autism or sensitive ears.

What we should have is a "children's section" in the back of the plane. If your party only contains adults, then you can only book in the adult section until it's filled, and same with parties that have kids. Parents don't want to disrupt everyone, but imagine this on a longer bus or train ride!

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I DROVE across Canada rather than dare take a plane with a possibility of screaming and kicking children. Sensory issues are a bitch.

[–] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've had to use canceling headphones for several hours a day for months due to asshole neighbours. Doing that provokes and exacerbates migraines. Using common sense and separating noise emitters from noise sufferers should always be the first step.

[–] iarigby@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

oh my god it’s so relieving to hear that i’m not the only one

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When I bring my whole family somewhere I almost always book the farthest back on the plane I can. There doesn't have to be specific sections... just people with common courtesy.

but one thing I'm noticing as a common theme in these threads is that there's an innate blame on the children/parents. Kids oftentimes CANNOT pop their ears due to how narrow their Eustachian tubes are. https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/flying-ears.html There can be cases where the baby's ears actually tear if the Eustachian tubes are blocked due to a cold or something of that nature.

The better answer is to just educate them in a friendly manner. If you do it tactfully then maybe junior will simmer down and everyone can move on without this passive aggressiveness we see in the photo. Giving the kid a bottle (if they're that young) is often all that needs to happen to work the tubes open a little bit to relieve the pain.

Now... if you're a parent... and have a colicky little one... skip the plane if you can. You know your kid. If they're not going to take to the plane well, then you're just being a dick to everyone around you.

[–] original_ish_name@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

So in other words: putting a sick young child on a plane is a health and safety risk for the child

[–] feck_it@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Imagine being an childless person in a children' section. No one should have this kind of pain for hours

[–] explodicle@local106.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, I'm imagining I'm a person who doesn't care and just needs to get on the next flight. I would have a choice that I don't have right now.

[–] feck_it@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I see your point, maybe the first company creates your idea should also have a red colored pop up with big puntos that says every time a seat is selected if that one is in a children's section and leave the judgement to the person who pays for the flight.

[–] victron@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Yep, during booking they should only show the back rows available if you're traveling with children of certain age. It should be simple, I think.